Monday, December 28, 2015

Global steel industry eyes India lifeline 29/12/2015

It is tough to find a bright spot in the global steel sector, as prices plunge and struggling Chinese producers flood world markets with their surplus stock. But if pressed, gloomy industry-watchers see at least some reason for optimism in Asia’s second-largest emerging market, India.
“There is really only one location that has the long-term potential to pull the global steel market out of its current slump, and that is India,” says Edwin Basson, director-general of the World Steel Association, a trade group. “But, and this is the big question, while India has huge unfilled demand and a big economy, when will all this be felt?”
India is already the world’s fourth-largest steel producer and is expected to overtake the US for third place in the next year or two. And while its steel consumption is barely a tenth that of the world’s largest user, China, it is at least expanding. Growth will be 8 per cent next year, according to Fitch, the ratings agency.
India is adding capacity too, led by its big three producers: Tata Steel, JSW Steel, and state-backed Steel Authority of India. Last month, Tata Steel inaugurated a huge new plant in the eastern state of Orissa, which eventually will nearly double its output.
Tata Steel in many way exemplifies India’s unusual place in world steel markets. The company’s loss-making European arm has been hammered by cheap imports and flat demand over recent years. It is now moving toward selling off part of its ailing UK division, having announced 1,200 job losses in October. The group’s Indian arm is much smaller, producing just a third of its output, but performs far better, last year contributing 80 per cent of group underlying profits.
Nevertheless, India’s steel producers are downbeat for two main reasons, the first being China. In common with their global counterparts, most have been hit badly as Chinese competitors send excess capacity abroad. Indian steel imports soared 72 per cent in the financial year to March 2015, and have risen further still this year.
Local production
Steelmakers are livid. Chinese exports have “caused havoc”, says billionaire tycoon Sajjan Jindal of JSW, India’s second-largest private sector steelmaker by revenue. Domestic steel appetite might be growing, he says, but local production is stagnant because imports mop up any increases in demand.
India’s government responded in August by increasing taxes and import duties on a range of steel products, curbing inflows somewhat. But Jindal and his fellow industrialists have been pushing for more, and this month policymakers in New Delhi introduced a series of further minor anti-dumping duties.
The second problem is poor finances. Indian steelmakers borrowed heavily to add capacity during the country’s mid-2000s boom years. Industry-wide net debt soared 10-fold over the last decade as a result, hitting roughly $50bn this year, according to Credit Suisse.
All that borrowing pushed capacity up by a third, with an extra 15 million tonnes added during this financial year alone, according to Fitch analyst Muralidharan Ramakrishnan. But it also came amid a plunge in global iron ore prices, undercutting the cost advantage that Indian producers often enjoyed by mining cheap domestic ore, a key component in steelmaking, and hitting profitability.
Many Indian steel projects also ran into regulatory difficulties, leaving once fast-growing groups like Mumbai-based Essar Steel struggling to pay down debts. A host of smaller companies are effectively bankrupt. Bureaucratic problems hit foreign producers too, notably South Korea’s Posco, which has mothballed a $12 billion (Dh44 billion) facility in the country. ArcelorMittal, the world’s largest steel group by revenue, scrapped a big plant two years back.
Cost competitive
JSW’s Jindal thinks a shakeout is needed. “There will be a correction,” he says, predicting that many minor groups will be swallowed up by larger ones. “These small steel producers will find it hard to operate; they are not environmentally friendly or cost competitive.”
Others are more optimistic, pointing both to India’s low per capita steel use and an upturn in the economy under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Growth rates are set to stay above 7 per cent over the next two years, boosting carmakers and steel-consuming sectors. Fiscal stimulus will help too, pumping money into new roads and railways.
India is not going to be able to replace China as global steel’s locomotive any time soon, says Kaushik Chatterjee, finance director of Tata Steel, but a mix of protection against unfair imports and fresh government spending can at least spark a new period of growth.
“The biggest trend which can come is more public spending on infrastructure,” he says. “If we get that, the future will look much better.”
Source: Gulf News

2016 year could mark the rebound of the dry bulk market to more sustainable levels

Mixed fortunes is what best describes the course of the shipping markets over the course of the year we’re about to part with. On one hand we have those involved in the dry bulk sector, which saw the market reach all-time lows, while on the other hand we have those involved in the tanker market, where freight rates rallied and seem poised to do so again in the future, although, as shipbroker Intermodal pointed out in its latest market report, the increasing orderbook might be the source of concerns in the future.
According to Intermodal’s SnP Broker, Mr. Panos Makrinos, “this year leaves us wondering who exactly the winners in the Dry Bulk sector were, if any. On the one side stand those who despite the market’s poor conditions went on acquiring vessels in the second hand market at heavily discounted rates compared to previous years’ levels, knowing that what lied ahead was a bad freight market that recently bottomed to its all-time low. On the other side stand those who decided to sell, for different reasons but most having to do with pressures exerted by the poor market. Those now have a certain cash flow and the possibility to either wait for a better market or even wait to purchase in the future at even lower levels, bearing of course the cost of losing current opportunities if these lower levels do not materialize. So in regards to the aforementioned question, of who the winner is the answer is fairly hard to give right now. It really depends on the strategy that each company and investor has set, baring always in mind that this is one of the most difficult and uncertain eras not only in regards to the dry bulk shipping market but pretty much in all those sectors that are affected by a dropping demand for commodities and consumption of goods”, Makrinos said.
Nevertheless, there are some market participants out there still being optimistic that during 2016 we might witness at least a slight improvement in dry bulk freight rates when compared to the unprecedented lows of this year. According to Mr. Makrinos, “they support that a few factors can help with that. Oil prices should remain close to $40/bbl. or if increase they will do so to levels still “comfortable” for ship operators. Activity in the demolition market will also reach even higher levels (currently even mid to late ‘90s built bulkers are offered for demo). Fleet growth will also side with owners, as the remaining orderbook is smaller than the one in the previous years. These are not “hard” and favor the argument for acquiring a vessel now, as dwt supply and costs of operating a vessel seem to be well “in control” at least for next year”.
On the other hand, as Intermodal’s analyst pointed out, “there are those, the majority actually, who argues that the Dry Bulk market will continue to hover around its current low levels. They support that we need to see a number of things happening before the market improves, things not expected to take place in 2016 according to them. The average demolition age should decrease further and faster; they support that even vessels of just 15yrs old should start coming up more often as demo candidates, something that we haven’t seen so far. In addition, a recovery in the steel industry accompanied by improvement in coal consumption should also take place. Their argument against the possibility of that happening is obviously the fact that coal imports mostly by China have slowed down and a rebound is not expected any time soon and that in regards to the steel industry almost every single analysis points to declining consumption next year as well”.
The analyst went on to note that “accurate forecasts are as rare as white Christmas here in Greece. Dry Bulk market participants will almost definitely have to show more patience in the months to come and try to remember that this is a market of big excitements and as most markets cyclical as well. You have bad times, followed by less bad times, followed by good times, followed by great times. So let’s ask ourselves, where are we now and where are we most probably heading next?”, Makrinos concluded.
Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

Survival of fittest for dry bulk shipping firms in 2016

Shipping companies that transport commodities such as coal, iron ore and grain face a painful year ahead, with only the strongest expected to weather a deepening crisis caused by tepid demand and a surplus of vessels for hire.
The predicament facing firms that ship commodities in large unpackaged amounts – known as dry bulk – is partly the result of slower coal and iron ore demand from leading global importer China in the second half of 2015.
The Baltic Exchange’s main sea freight index – which tracks rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities – plunged to an all-time low this month.
In stark contrast, however, tankers that transport oil have in recent months enjoyed their best earnings in years. As crude prices have plummeted, bargain-buying has driven up demand, while owners have moved more aggressively to scrap vessels to head off the kind of surplus seen in the dry bulk market.
Symeon Pariaros, chief administrative officer of Athens-run and New York-listed shipping firm Euroseas, said the outlook for the dry bulk market was “very challenging”.
“Demand fundamentals are so weak. The Chinese economy, which is the main driver of dry bulk, is way below expectations,” he added. “Only companies with very strong balance sheets will get through this storm.”
The dry bulk shipping downturn began in 2008, after the onset of the financial crisis, and has worsened significantly this year as the Chinese economy has slowed. The Baltic Exchange’s main BDI index – which gauges the cost of shipping such commodities, also including cement and fertilizer – is more than 95 percent down from a record high hit in 2008.
The index is often regarded as a forward-looking economic indicator. With about 90 percent of the world’s traded goods by volume transported by sea, global investors look to the BDI for any signs of changes in sentiment for industrial demand.
“The state of the dry bulk market especially indicates that economies worldwide are likely to stay weak, much to the disappointment of central banks … FX traders, miners, steel makers, trading houses, and commodity economies,” said Basil Karatzas, head of New York consultancy and brokerage Karatzas Marine Advisors & Co.
Ratings agency Fitch downgraded the shipping sector to negative, from stable, this month due to slowing global trade and an economic slowdown in emerging markets, adding that dry bulk would remain under pressure.
COMMODITY PRESSURE
Slowing demand and concerns over the health of the Chinese and global economies have pushed the 19-commodity Thomson Reuters/Core Commodity CRB Index, which tracks the prices of 19 commodities including oil and grains, to its lowest level since 2002.
“There is no doubt that the overall macro situation is one that does not engender a lot of confidence for increased trade flows in 2016 and beyond,” said Khalid Hashim, managing director of Precious Shipping, one of Thailand’s largest dry cargo ship owners.
Worsening conditions have already claimed casualties.
In September, Japanese bulk carrier Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha filed for protection from creditors, and private equity backed Global Maritime Investment Cyprus Ltd filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States.
Smaller dry bulk ship owners are expected to struggle in coming months.
“There are clearly big problems for almost all dry bulk owners, certainly those who cannot subsidize dry bulk through ownership in tankers. Debt can only be serviced through reserves of capital and not from cash-flow,” said Tony Foster, chief executive of British shipping asset manager Marine Capital.
“Public companies will issue discounted shares. Small private companies without obvious external support will be at the most risk.”
Ship owners are also contending with more vessel orders, which are expected to increase oversupply further.
While the dry bulk market has been in a downturn since 2008, there have been brief rebound periods of relatively good earnings in that time that emboldened ship owners to order more vessels, which normally take up to three years to deliver.
“Too many factors are against ship owners at present, and January sees a disproportionate delivery of vessels from the shipyards,” said Karatzas.
Analysis from Axia Capital Markets showed the cumulative loss of revenues for 13 shipping companies publicly listed in New York reached over $3.36 billion in the first nine months of 2015.
“Given the current oversupply of vessels in the marketplace that has built up over the past five years, we expect rates to remain at depressed levels for at least two more years as the market struggles to find a new equilibrium,” said Robert Perri of Axia Capital Markets.
DIVERGING FORTUNES
By contrast, demand for oil tankers and the rates they command have surged to their highest levels since 2008 in the past three months.
Dry bulk shipping markets have been hit hard by a slide in demand for coal by China, which is also trying to ease its dependence on the polluting fuel and meet environmental pledges.
But the country has been looking to boost strategic reserves of crude, taking advantage of multi-year lows in prices, which has helped the oil tanker market rally. Earlier this month China said it more than doubled the size of its strategic crude oil reserves between November 2014 and the middle of this year, a rate exceeding analysts’ estimates.
Oil tanker players have been more conservative since 2008 in ordering ships as they experienced rock-bottom rates that saw earnings falling below zero as recently as last year, meaning owners clocked up losses every day. The scrapping of tankers, which picked up in 2011, has also shrunk the fleet.
Average earnings for supertankers hauling 2 million barrels of oil on the benchmark Middle East Gulf to Japan route have surged to over $110,000 a day.
In contrast, average earnings for capesize ships, among the largest vessels used to haul coal and iron ore, have slumped to under $5,000 a day in recent weeks – below the basic operating cost level a ship needs to break even, which is around $8,000.
“The (tanker) market is on fire,” said Deutsche Bank analyst Amit Mehrotra, but added: “Owners of dry bulk ships are likely to spend the holiday break quietly reflecting on how they will further endure the worst market many have seen in their lifetimes.”
Source: Reuters (Editing by Veronica Brown and Pravin Char) via Hellenic shipping news 

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

New iron ore berth to be developed in Paradip

02.06.15
12:02
 
According to hellenicshippingnews, Paradip Port Trust (PPT) and JSW Paradip Terminal Private Limited (JSWPTPL) have signed a concession agreement to develop a new berth for handling iron ore at the port.
The deal provides for 30 year concession period during which JSW would develop, operate and maintain modern mechanized terminal of 10 MTPA capacity at an estimated project cost of Rs 740 crore.
JSW would invest about Rs 605 crore and PPT would contribute the balance towards providing the supporting infrastructure facilities.
The environment-friendly and efficient terminal operations would provide employment and entrepreneurship opportunities for locals and would actively contribute to the socio economic development of Paradip region.
(via Me-freight)

Indian economy poised to grow at 9-10% in medium-term: CII

NEW DELHI: India's economy can grow at 9-10 per cent in the medium-term with a multi-pronged economic strategy, industry body CII said today, outlining ten areas requiring policy attention that can bring huge economic benefits for growth, investment and employment creation.
The areas highlighted by the industry body for more attention include macro-economy, mining, manufacturing, land acquisition, energy, labour reforms, skill development, taxation, financial sector and Companies Act.

On macro-economy, it hoped that the government would stay the course on fiscal discipline.
"Setting a ceiling on subsidy expenditure would be an important step in that direction," said CII PresidentSumit Mazumder.
The industry body suggested that all subsidy disbursal may be converted into direct benefit transfer (DBT) by linking Jan Dhan Yojana, Aadhar and mobile technology or the JAM trinity, including for foodgrains, LPG and kerosene, within two years.
Welcoming the government's resolve to introduce GST, CII said the indirect tax reform would add 1.5 percentage points to the GDP growth rate.
On Land Acquisition Bill, CII suggested that compensation package should be reviewed to reduce rehabilitation and resettlement costs as sellers receive multiples of market value on acquisition.
The consent clause from Gram Sabhas should be dropped as it is already required from land owners for Schedule V areas, it suggested.
"There is huge need for ex-ante zoning of land for identification of land use over a 100 year time horizon and establishment of State Land Bank Corporations for scientific acquisition and disbursal of land parcels for industrialisation and urbanisation," Mazumder said.
The industry body welcomed several path-breaking economic reform measures announced by the Narendra Modi-led government during the last one year and called for continuing the strong momentum across ten critical areas.
"The government has exceeded the expectations of industry in the area of economic reforms. We are hopeful that the government would continue to maintain strong momentum of reforms going forward," Mazumder added.
The industry body categorised the government's achievements during the year into four areas: corruption-free governance; economic diplomacy; empowerment of states; and putting in place key policies to revive investment in the economy.
With transformational changes being envisioned not only on the economic front but also on the social, technology and foreign policy fronts, the first anniversary of the Modi government has been marked by fresh thinking on all major areas of governance, CII said.
On infrastructure, the industry body suggested renegotiation of PPPs, securing government approvals before award of projects, long-term financing options, systematic exit policies and dispute resolution, among others.
It also highlighted that non-performing assets in the infrastructure sector must be distinguished from those in other sectors.
In the area of energy, CII requested the government to address financial health of distribution companies to facilitate expansion of power and coal sectors.
"The Electricity (Amendment) Bill draft separating carriage and content is in accordance with CII recommendations and should be passed speedily. In the hydrocarbons sector, there is need for a roadmap for transition to a market-based gas pricing," it said.
In the mining sector, it said exploration by private sector can be facilitated through an Exploration Fund for scarce minerals.
It also emphasised on a National Steel Policy with focus on availability of ores and coal, a reasonable tariff regime, long-term financing, and skill development.
 (source:PTI May 27, 2015 via economic times)

India’s economy accelerated faster than China in the first quarter of 2015 -May 31, 2015

India is raking up its economic reputation since Narendra Modi took over the Prime Ministerial role. Data on Friday indicated that the Indian economy has grown faster than that of China in the first quarter of the year. A 7.5 percent growth was registered by India, which is a little higher than the 7 percent growth shown by China in the same quarter.

Despite facing criticism over the land acquisition bill and farmer suicides, Narendra Modi is encouraging investment friendly policies, owing to which India is making a great recovery in the economic sector. The Prime Minister has to be credited for this rise and growth of the Indian economy.

When we consider sectors like Finance, Insurance and Real Estate, the growth has been recorded to be 11.5 percent. Many experts have come out in open to praise the policies of India and how they are progressing over the time. The managing director of the International Monetary Fund Christine Lagarde said that India retains a bright spot in the cloudy global horizon. Rajiv Biswas, Asia Pacific chief economist for the research firm HIS also said, “The Indian economy has shown signs of gradual recovery, but over the last year this has not met market expectations”.
Modi government has been receiving an ample of praise due to the acceleration of the Indian economy in the recent past. They are planning to spend $11 billion this year on the projects of railways, road and other infrastructure. This is done in order to derive more private investment in the country.
The Central Stats Office however saw a decline in the economic growth of India which has come down to 6.6 percent from 7.5 percent on Friday. It raises a substantial number of questions on the new method that is used for measuring an economic activity.
( source:thenextdigit)
 

SAIL's coking coal imports to touch 35 mn tonne by 2025

Presently, SAIL's coking coal imports is around 12 to 13 million tonnes. This will go up to 18 million tonnes by 2017-18," executive director of the company P Raychaudhury said.

State-run steel maker SAIL  's coking coal imports will touch 35 million tonnes by 2025 when the targetted production capacity is projected to touch 50 million tonnes, a company official said. "Presently, SAIL's coking coal imports is around 12 to 13 million tonnes. This will go up to 18 million tonnes by 2017-18," executive director of the company P Raychaudhury said.

When the projected steel production capacity was to touch 50 million tonnes per annum as per Vision 2025, the quantum of coking coal imports would reach 35 million tonnes, he said at the CII Logistics Colloquium here today.

Regarding exports of steel, he said that presently SAIL was exporting 0.5 million tonnes of steel, which was supposed to go up to two million tonnes post expansion. 

To handle the increasing amount of imports, the SAIL official said that the company was looking at other ports besides Haldia, Vizag and Paradip. 

SAIL had already started importing through Dhamra and Gangavaram ports as well, Raychaudhury said. Quantum of limestone import of SAIL currently was one million tonnes, he said. 

SAIL stock price On June 03, 2015, Steel Authority of India closed at Rs 64.85, down Rs 0.85, or 1.29 percent. The 52-week high of the share was Rs 112.90 and the 52-week low was Rs 64.20. 

The company's trailing 12-month (TTM) EPS was at Rs 5.07 per share as per the quarter ended March 2015. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 12.79. The latest book value of the company is Rs 108.36 per share. At current value, the price-to-book value of the company is 0.60.

Source: PT via moneycontrol.com

Adani Group mulling to bid for Sindri urea plant in Jharkhand 31 May, 2015,

NEW DELHI: Billionaire Gautam Adani-led Adani Enterprises is mulling to bid for the now-shut Sindri urea plant in Jharkhand as the USD 9.4 billion group plans to foray into the fertiliser sector. 

The commodities-to-infrastructure group is seriously considering to participate in the tender which the government is likely to float soon for revival of the urea plant, sources said. 

The plant, which has been lying shut since 2002, may require at least Rs 6,000 crore investment for  .. 

Sources said senior officials of Adani Group recently met Fertiliser Ministry officials to show interest in revival of Sindri fertiliser plant. 

When contacted, Adani Group spokesperson declined to comment. 

Adani Group, founded in 1988 for import and export commodities, has grown into a USD 9.4 billion enterprise with interests spanning from coal to power, ports to logistics and infrastructure. 

Sources said in their meetings with government officials, Adani group executives have shown keen interest in Sindri fertiliser plant revival. 

The Cabinet had earlier this month approved revival of the closed urea plant at Sindri in Jharkhand by selecting an operator through open bidding. 

The decision for bidding was taken after SAIL withdrew from its earlier proposal to revive Sindri plant in joint venture with National Fertilisers Ltd (NFL). Fertiliser Corporation of India Lt Sindri unit was the first PSU in independent India. The unit is lying defunct and is not in operation since 2002. 

Sources said Sindri plant assumes importance as there is no functional urea unit in the eastern India except two small units at Namrup in Assam. 

The Sindri plant could cater the demands of urea in the states like Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, as neither of these states have any fertiliser plant. 

Urea is a controlled commodity and its maximum price is fixed at Rs 5,360 per tonne. The difference between cost of production and selling price is paid as subsidy to the manufacture .. 

At present, India's urea production is stagnant at 22 million tonnes, while the annual demand of the country is 30 million tonnes, the rest is met through imports. 

Source:economic times

GE Shipping takes delivery of new vessel 03 Jun, 2015

Great Eastern Shipping Company, the shipping and offshore service provider, took delivery of its new building Kamsarmax dry bulk carrier "Jag Arnav". The vessel of about 81,600 dwt was built at Tsuneishi Heavy Industries (Cebu), Philippines.

After the addition of this new vessel, the company's current fleet stands at 30 vessels, comprising 21 tankers (8 crude carriers, 12 product tankers, 1 LPG carrier) and 9 dry bulk carriers (4 Kamsarmax and 5 Supramax) with an average age of 9.6 years aggregating 2.4 mn dwt.

Shares of the company declined Rs 0.3, or 0.09%, to trade at Rs 335.25. The total volume of shares traded was 28,068 at the BSE (2.45 p.m., Wednesday).

Source: IRIS | 03 Jun, 2015, 02.44PM

China ‘needs more WA iron ore (02/06/2015)

WA’s mining boom is not over because China’s high demand for iron ore is still growing, the head of an Australian chamber of commerce in Shanghai says.
AustCham Shanghai chairman Peter Arkell said the Chinese Government’s urbanisation policy was driving continuing demand for WA’s high-quality iron ore.
Almost half China’s population of 1.4 billion live in rural areas and many are impoverished subsistence farmers.
Their low productivity prompted the Government to move millions of people into cities to boost their contribution to the nation’s economy as workers and consumers.
Mr Arkell told _The West Australian _he was disappointed with the perception in Australia that the mining boom was over. “We are selling more iron ore here year on year,” he said. “Last month’s was far greater than the month before.”
Mr Arkell, who has headed AustCham in Shanghai for 12 years, compared China’s current state of development to that of the US in the mid-1800s.
“To feed a population, you don’t need more than 10 per cent of the population doing rural activities. But in China, it’s just under 50 per cent (doing rural work),” he said.
“These are unproductive, not contributing much to the GDP of the nation. It’s very important for the economy to get to the point where the rural workforce is also 10 per cent, and get the other 30-40 per cent into the cities doing something more productive.”
China’s population is expected to keep rising until 2030 when it is projected to peak at 1.53 billion people.
WA accounts for 80 per cent of China’s investment in Australia’s mining and energy sectors.
Last year, WA exported 550 million tonnes of iron ore, 59 per cent of the total volume of China’s iron ore imports. Mr Arkell said China produces 300 million tonnes of iron ore a year, but at a much higher cost than in WA because it has to dig up one billion tonnes of material to produce that.
“China is shifting to a domestic market,” he said. “The fire has been lit under the economy so we are going to be using all the resources.”
But a return to high iron ore prices cannot be expected.
“We got caught. The price went to extreme because we could not meet it (demand),” Mr Arkell said.
Sam Phoen, ANZ China’s head of global markets, said Australia seemed to be more worried about China’s economic growth slowdown than China was.
(Source: The West Australian Via Hellanic shipping news)